A Missouri church has scored a decisive victory for religious freedom, winning a case at the Supreme Court that hinged on the issue of the separation of church and state.
The church had been denied a state grant for a playground, with the reason given that the state could not award tax dollars to a religious institution. The church sued, and the Supreme Court just decided in their favor.
The decision was decisive and not along ideological lines – the vote was 7-2.
The only dissenters were Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Sotomayor said the ruling “slights both our precedents and our history, and its reasoning weakens this country’s longstanding commitment to a separation of church and state beneficial to both.”
The case, one of the most closely watched of the term, pitted two parts of the First Amendment against one another – freedom of religion and separation of church and state.
The dispute involved Trinity Lutheran Church in Columbia, Mo., and the state of Missouri.
In 2012, the state launched an initiative to encourage schools to use recycled tires to produce softer playground surfaces. Trinity, which runs a preschool, was denied a state grant to participate in the program — and lawyers for Trinity argued the state discriminated against the school based on religion.
Chief Justice John Roberts agreed.
“The exclusion of Trinity Lutheran from a public benefit for which it is otherwise qualified, solely because it is a church, is odious to our Constitution all the same, and cannot stand,” Roberts wrote.
During oral arguments in April, Justice Elana Kagan also questioned the church’s exclusion.
“You’re denying one set of actors from competing [for the grant money] because of religion,” Kagan said. She called it a “clear burden on a constitutional right.
The state program gives grants to nonprofits seeking a safer recreational environment for children. But Missouri’s law at the time — similar to those in roughly three-dozen other states – prohibited direct government aid to educational institutions that have a religious affiliation.
Since then, Republican Gov. Eric Greitens has changed the state policy to allow religious institutions to participate in the program but Monday’s opinion could have an impact on other cases.
Maureen Ferguson, senior policy advisor with The Catholic Association, called the ruling “a significant victory for fairness and government neutrality towards religious institutions.”
“The Supreme Court is sharply signaling in this decision that the government must stop its growing hostility towards religion and religious institutions, and that antiquated and anti-Catholic Blaine Amendments should not be used as a weapon to discriminate against people of faith.”
Here is video from Fox News.
What do you think of the Supreme Court ruling on the separation of church and state? Let us know in the comments, and in addition, share this on social media.