Jeff Sessions scandal

The allegations that Attorney General Jeff Sessions committed perjury in his confirmation hearing testimony is just not correct.

Perjury, as a matter of law, must be willfully false testimony.

Willfulness is the criminal law’s most demanding mens rea (state of mind) requirement. Inaccuracy is not perjury, although Sessions made a statement which was not inaccurate.

He said he did not have any contact with the Russians as part of the campaign. He answered the question he was asked. Therefore, when there is an allegation of perjury, the alleged false statements must be considered in context. Any ambiguity is construed in favor of innocence. If there is potential misunderstanding, the lack of clarity is deemed the fault of the questioner, not the accused.

This is the transcript of the exchange between Sessions and Senator Al Franken (D – MN):

Sessions stated that he did not have “communications with the Russians.” We now know there were at least two occasions during the 2016 campaign where Sessions, then a senator and a member of the chamber’s Armed Services Committee, had contact with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States.

The first can be dismissed: Sessions saw a group of ambassadors including Kislyak at a Heritage Foundation reception during the Republican convention.

As Sessions was leaving the podium, a group of diplomats, including Kislyak, came over to Sessions to chat briefly; to compliment him on his remarks. The Washington Post described it as a chance meeting.

A second meeting occurred in September in Sessions’ Senate office. The Post dramatically claims that this meeting occurred “at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.” It’s obvious that description is meant to hype the truth.

A U.S intelligence report claimed the Russian cyber effort targeted both major parties, not just Democrats. The successful hacking of Democratic e-mail accounts had already happened by September. There is no evidence that anyone in the Trump campaign was in any way complicit in the hacking. Also there’s no evidence the hacking affected the outcome of the election. No evidence no story right? Not if you are the desperate Democrat Party trying to de-legitimize the Presidential election of Donald Trump.

Is there really a Jeff Sessions scandal here? The facts say no!

The entire story is built on speculation. It has no truth in it. If indeed there were any truth to this story, the entire mainstream media and all the Democrats would be waving said proof like a banner for all to see. This is about a sad party who lost the election, because they are angry and want to take President Trump down.

I am so disappointed in the Attorney General’s decision to recuse himself from the Russian hacking investigation, because it proves he is not a fighter. The President said he did not believe Sessions should recuse himself. Sessions recusing himself gives Democrats a win. I am not surprised they have started to demand he step down. They smell blood in the water and you can bet they are circling him for the kill, because they want to “get” the President. They will continue baseless attacks until they catch President Trump in something.

Do you buy into the Democrats’ claims of a Jeff Sessions scandal? Let us know in the comments, and in addition, share this on social media!

Here’s How To Be Sure To Continue Seeing Our Content On Facebook

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.