The official number of illegal aliens living in California is nearly 3 million.  We don’t really know what the true number of illegals living there are so we can estimate the number to be more than double this amount. That is about half of all drivers licenses issued in California which were given to individuals who are here illegally. The state automatically registers those people with a driver’s license to vote.

Just in case you didn’t know this fact; in 2015, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill giving full voting rights to illegal aliens. This gives them the right to vote in all elections from a local level to national elections, including that of choosing who will become President. I don’t know why this hasn’t become a bigger deal. I have not seen this reported much. The problem I have with this is that California is violating the U.S Constitution. Although according states rights advocates each state stands alone and separate from Federal government; the states do not have a right to violate the U.S. Constitution.  This in itself negates the votes made by illegal aliens in California and any other state which allows them to vote.

According to the law in California, which gives Illegal aliens the right to vote, along with the Federal law that prohibits them from participating in national elections, we must conclude that all votes cast in California for President of the United States be considered null and void. What this means is the state of California’s votes, both in the upcoming primaries and the general election, have to be disqualified.

In all fairness to the candidates running for president, and abiding by Federal law the Federal government simply must prohibit California votes from counting until which time the state can prove that no illegal alien vote was cast in national elections. The state has the right to permit them to vote in local and state elections if they choose, but not in national elections.

Since the sheer numbers of illegal aliens voting in California is astounding and is more than likely double that of legal citizens voting, the tally from the primaries should have held out and no delegates awarded. What we have here in California has disqualified itself  from national elections. It is against Federal law because of the U.S. Constitution  to allow non citizens to vote, it would be keeping people who have no right to be here in the first place from influencing the outcome of elections nationally. The simple fact that they are here in this country illegally supersedes them from having any rights as legal citizens in making decisions as to who runs our country. Is any question the democrat party wants to allow illegals to vote in national elections?


All you need to is to read the following Podesta email which confirms the reason why democrats are trying their hardest to legalize illegals. They know they are doing something illegal and underhanded themselves. Oh,  if only all states would do as California has done then they wouldn’t have to discuss this in back rooms and alleys.



In the latest Wikileaks Podesta documents John Podesta actually says it is OK for illegals to vote if they have a driver’s license.

Trump says the system is rigged.
Then we see this email the next day.

John Podesta: “I think Teddy’s idea scratches the itch, is pretty safe and uncomplicated.
On the picture ID, the one thing I have thought of in that space is that if you show up on Election Day with a drivers license with a picture, attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.”



No other country in the world allows individuals who are non citizens to vote in any election.


*** Please share this page on Facebook, Twitter, Email and other social media with the share tools on this page because OUR voice is YOUR voice! ***

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.